True Seeing
Moderators: Dasaria Game DMs, A&SI Moderators
True Seeing
Ok do any other rogues out there think that this spell should be modified? I mean I have played on another server on NWN 1 that changed the spell so that it instead of being able to automatically see through stealth it actually confers a +10 to spot and listen. Just want to know what you guys think.
-
broncoblitz
- Dasarian Hero
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:55 am
- Location: A modern magician working in a Lab
-
Stormknife
- Dasarian Hero
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:24 am
- Main Player Character: Draco
- Other PCs: Shroud, Lorcann
- Location: The Original Dasarian Kitsune.
My name is Hax, and I've played rogues since forever.
I say wait until stealth works before we go about tweaking true seeing. It'd suck to waste some DM's time scripting something that won't work after a patch or two anyway.
I say wait until stealth works before we go about tweaking true seeing. It'd suck to waste some DM's time scripting something that won't work after a patch or two anyway.
Draco - "Allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste."
Lorcann - "BACON!"
<*>
Lorcann - "BACON!"
<*>
-
broncoblitz
- Dasarian Hero
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:55 am
- Location: A modern magician working in a Lab
Or maybe we could have Jay add more illusionary based spells and then remove the ability to percieve hidden creatrues entirely.
Come on Jay you know you want em!
Come on Jay you know you want em!
I'm always right. I'm also a jerk. It's not my fault you can't get over the latter to see the former.
Hurray for Me!
Topic titles are like turn signals. They aren't for your benefit, but for the people around you.
Hurray for Me!
Topic titles are like turn signals. They aren't for your benefit, but for the people around you.
Changes like this are not real difficult to do, maybe 10 minutes to change, 20 minutes to test, and then minor bug fixes for the next week as clever players find all sorts of things you never thought of. heh.
The real trick is making it all balance out properly. You get a lot of unintended side-effects. Personally I don't even light spot and listen bonuses. Thats not what it's supposed to do either, although admittedly it's not as bad what is effectively an infinite bonus. But yeah. the automatic spot must go, and it will.
I do tend to like to sit on these things for a while though. I find that ideas incubate pretty well after a while. Sometimes better answers come up, sometimes a patch fixes it on it's own.
And yes, BB - I'd love to see some real illusion spells. I dunno if it is possible to even remotely do it justice though. Maybe we could have illusionary monster summoning, or illusionary fireballs or something, that TS would provide immunity to. It would be tough though, and disbelieveing would be just under impossible to do "by the book", particularlly with the metagame knowledge people have.
The real trick is making it all balance out properly. You get a lot of unintended side-effects. Personally I don't even light spot and listen bonuses. Thats not what it's supposed to do either, although admittedly it's not as bad what is effectively an infinite bonus. But yeah. the automatic spot must go, and it will.
I do tend to like to sit on these things for a while though. I find that ideas incubate pretty well after a while. Sometimes better answers come up, sometimes a patch fixes it on it's own.
And yes, BB - I'd love to see some real illusion spells. I dunno if it is possible to even remotely do it justice though. Maybe we could have illusionary monster summoning, or illusionary fireballs or something, that TS would provide immunity to. It would be tough though, and disbelieveing would be just under impossible to do "by the book", particularlly with the metagame knowledge people have.
I don't agree with nerfing True Seeing. It's a very situational spell, and those tend to have a more powerful effect when they can actually be used.
If it still gets nerfed as suggested above, in my opinion it should have its spell level lowered or, alternatively, be given increased duration.
If it still gets nerfed as suggested above, in my opinion it should have its spell level lowered or, alternatively, be given increased duration.
Last edited by xAndersx on Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jeren Blackbolt - spellsword (inactive)
Nilver - nimblefinger
Leoric Oakheart - servant of Iaosia
Mar - frontline fighter
Nilver - nimblefinger
Leoric Oakheart - servant of Iaosia
Mar - frontline fighter
-
obsoletenihilist
- Dasarian Scout
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 11:13 pm
Will saves instead of reflex or fort saves perhaps? Like you toss an illusionary fireball and they make a will save or it damages them for magic damage instead of fire damage. If they make the will save it doesn't do a thing.Jay Four wrote: It would be tough though, and disbelieveing would be just under impossible to do "by the book", particularlly with the metagame knowledge people have.
-
Stormknife
- Dasarian Hero
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:24 am
- Main Player Character: Draco
- Other PCs: Shroud, Lorcann
- Location: The Original Dasarian Kitsune.
The duration is long enough (or can be made long enough with extend) that mages will always have it running. Or, at the least, can run it long enough that it outlasts the rest timer.xAndersx wrote:I don't agree with nerfing True Seeing. It's a very situational spell, and those tend to have a more powerful effect when they can actually be used.
If it still gets nerfed as suggested above, in my opinion it should have its spell level lowered or, alternatively, be given increased duration.
Draco - "Allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste."
Lorcann - "BACON!"
<*>
Lorcann - "BACON!"
<*>
Ah, alright. Lower level then.Stormknife wrote:The duration is long enough (or can be made long enough with extend) that mages will always have it running. Or, at the least, can run it long enough that it outlasts the rest timer.xAndersx wrote:I don't agree with nerfing True Seeing. It's a very situational spell, and those tend to have a more powerful effect when they can actually be used.
If it still gets nerfed as suggested above, in my opinion it should have its spell level lowered or, alternatively, be given increased duration.
Jeren Blackbolt - spellsword (inactive)
Nilver - nimblefinger
Leoric Oakheart - servant of Iaosia
Mar - frontline fighter
Nilver - nimblefinger
Leoric Oakheart - servant of Iaosia
Mar - frontline fighter
-
muletang
- Dasarian Hero
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:04 pm
- Location: Aotearoa - Land of the Long White Cloud
the only problem i had with true seeing and those spells in Das1 was that people would sit around with them permacast making it rather naughty for little sneaks to do their sneaking! ha, make anyone who takes the spell receive a pair of specs in their inventory with the eyeballs on springs. All fair then in my opinion 
I don't feel any shame, I won't apologise
--
"...I do not entertain the possibility of an afterlife, or any deity capable of offering it. Given the world that he created, it would be an impiety against God to believe in him..."
--
"...I do not entertain the possibility of an afterlife, or any deity capable of offering it. Given the world that he created, it would be an impiety against God to believe in him..."
-
Peregrinus
- 2012 Best Screenshot Winner
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:27 pm
- Main Player Character: Phelan "Tennick" Almaran
- Other PCs: Skia Sonnen
- Bioware Username: Peregry
- Location: Woodbridge, VA, USA
You know, mages wouldn't have had it cast all the time had it not been that every evil mage and rogue would come sneaking about at all times. If they'd laid off the invis or sneaking and found other ways of making trouble, we might have forgotten it occasionally.
As it was, I only cast it when I suspected something was going on, or when I was trying to interact with an invisible character.
Wait to nerf the spell, and if you do nerf it, don't make it so that its completely worthless to take like it ended up in Dasaria 1.
As it was, I only cast it when I suspected something was going on, or when I was trying to interact with an invisible character.
Wait to nerf the spell, and if you do nerf it, don't make it so that its completely worthless to take like it ended up in Dasaria 1.
-
Stormknife
- Dasarian Hero
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:24 am
- Main Player Character: Draco
- Other PCs: Shroud, Lorcann
- Location: The Original Dasarian Kitsune.
If das 1 is anything like das 2 ....I am very not surprised at all that they had it running 24/7.
Das 2 is LITTERED with thieves. I know people lose halberds, great axes, full plate, not to mention tons of rare crafting components.
You may think it's fun to role play a thief, but so do 50 other uber-kiddies. The result is what we have now....Even if 'you' only steal twice from the same person a day, you and the 15 other thieves can strip a person clean in a single play session.
Das 2 is LITTERED with thieves. I know people lose halberds, great axes, full plate, not to mention tons of rare crafting components.
You may think it's fun to role play a thief, but so do 50 other uber-kiddies. The result is what we have now....Even if 'you' only steal twice from the same person a day, you and the 15 other thieves can strip a person clean in a single play session.