Mon-da-oth wrote:Just because I disagree doesn't make you a bad player or your ideas useless and it doesn't have anything to do with the amount of time you or I have been on the server. I would be willing to bet that you have more play time in than me despite the fact that I have been on the server longer.
You have had some wonder ideas and I have supported those. If the one time I disagree with you ruins your entire play time on the sever then I will refrain from commenting on anything you have to say in the future, but what I was reading in this thread came across to me as a lack of respect to the work of those that put so much effort into creating the idea behind the Cuhannans.
On the points that you made that I do agree with; Falchions should be included, the crocodile does seem bit odd in the context it is included and there "could be" some CG Cuhanans. So it would seem that I agree with most of what you have proposed and simply disagree in the manner it is being presented.
sorry...I think you wrong with calling me "simple demanding".. I do respect The Explorer's work, and i tried to express it, sorry if i failed..
please re-read my posts... i did not shown disrespect... all i asked is the implementation/reviewing of things, you agrreing with me actually about...
few things:
1. i am not native english speaker
2. i log to forums from the job often
those 2 mean that sometimes i have time to polish my text, and sometimes it will look like raw translation, and, perhaps bit rough.
so perhaps i may sound too harsh because of that and because instead of DM-like cooperation/solid explanation i just got judgement about how "kosher" our sisters are, and fact that we need some kind of "approval". We do like to play CG Cuhannans, and all reason of this thread is to make positive feedback with few corrections....
So, as you agree by yourself with my points, means i was not just "simple" (as you expresed) "demanding". I was:
1. Asking for improvement.
2. Giving feedback.
3. Expressed my hostility to:
a. idea that our cuhanna chars must pass some kind of approval/viability check. We do not want to play with S'Arappu faction, and please do not see any offence in that... The idea is freedom loving hot girls which fights for equality..and have mean magic daddy in his tower far in mysterious south cuhanna
b. "adamant lore" concept - which also been denied by Evelond... in P&P DMs oftn fit their game to players, and vice versa.. Also much of The Explorer's sayings were adamant, but, as i told - i know, perhaps, about desert more than him, and that in D&D human nations (any) open to CG alignemtn, no matter what their goverment - that means if goverment is LE, CG will represent "rebel" side.
Your post, buddy hovever, didnt confirmed agreement with my points, but confirmed the concpet of adamant lore, viability of "being proper" check from The Explorer... but somehow it ended being more offending than Explorers adamant at start, but confirming some change later posts.
No offence meant, and i do not demand things... As i recall one of Explorers posts recently to create Das by our hands - here i am, helping creating, and telling my, not simple, but serious analysis feedback, and slight improvemnt Which may bring more people play Cuhannans (not on IC/RP Mordecai’s side though :eP )
I do / did respected The Explorer's work, said so, thinking so, and being basing my rp already on it... simply i found...felt .. "forgotten" , not having option to play charaters which fit cuhannan image, but hard to fit to deity list, as well noted oddity of crocodile/blue color being symbol of sand strom god.
I didnt came with telling "Hey Bro ur deities are crap, change them all " I've told "Buddy you done great job, but please add some things into hole i found, because it will deny many things/people playing Cuhannans" .. and then "Buddy, dont judge my characters, and dont get offended on me bcause i want to create oposite alignemnt cuhannans to your S'Arappu faction... "
I have experience of being DM/ being modder.... and i being reciving critique frequently... but in most cases it even not critique - just things which i wasnt able to notice, because had too much information to work on/take care off, and missed some details...